#Deer hunter forum movie
#Deer hunter forum full
#Deer hunter forum professional

This is a LONG RANGE HUNTING FORUM! Ryan Avery Replies 0 Views 11K. 30 and practice a bunch in FIELD positions.

#Deer hunter forum full

Full Story: Royal Range USA is NashvilleвЂ™s best shooting range, offering modern, state-of-the-art indoor spaces suited for a variety of firearms. Thread starter fabricator21 Start date Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum Become a supporting member.

This Area is for Discussions on All Breeds of Ruger Made Centerfire Rifles and Shotguns.

Come join the discussion about optics, trails, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more! As a Huntin' Fool All-Access or 1-on-1 Member, you have access to the team of full-time Hunt Advisors who provide consulting for hunt planning, outfitter selection, outdoor gear research, application strategies, and more.

The Terrapin is the best but also cost more than double the 2700.

For example, with typical 308 loads and rifles, we are interested in ranges from 25 yards out to about 700-1100 yards, depending on ambient conditions and the particular load.

For me the perfect hunting reticle would be the leupold wind plex in FFP.

The sole purpose of this site is to provide an online community for those who wish to interact with other Savage firearm enthusiasts. Discuss tips and strategies or ask a question.

The 336CB that Bristlecone Jan used to win the Long Range Lever Action match at the recent Texas SASS Championship was one that I honed the chamber on.

I would offer that a SWC has a poor ballistic performance for long range.

I have no issue with the length.Long range hunting forum Just a pleasant companion to take to the woods.

#Deer hunter forum movie

So much of this movie just seems hard to believe for me.

#Deer hunter forum professional

How common was this sort of thing happening among US Soldiers over there? I always had heard this was this great Vietnam flick and after watching I just kept thinking, How can a movie that is supposed to represent the Vietnam war have these seemingly incoherent or very out of place scenes and still be true to the experience over there? I also found myself trying to calculate the odds that Walken's character could be this like professional Russian roulette guy and not die before De Niro went back and found him. Again, while the scene is great and well-acted and suspenseful and all that. Maybe, I am wrong about this, I dont know.Дў. Were flame throwers common weapons in Vietnam? It seem to me to be very strange to have a flame thrower involved in the very first Vietnam scene of the film. But I seem to recall that we are immediately thrown into a scene of De Niro using a flame thrower. I dont remember when/what happens to transition us to the Vietnam part of the film (its been several years since my only viewing of this film).

So: an utter dud, as far as I'm concerned. Of course, a lot of the film's initial success was down to its being the first film to seriously confront the issue of America's involvement in Viet Nam (the live action cartoon that is The Green Berets doesn't count). Streep, it must be said, does an excellent job in creating a character out of nothing. This has a 'distancing' effect on this viewer, who is blinded by the star-power on screen. The men all look far too old to be fighting in Viet Nam.ДЄND - when the film was made only one of the leading actors (De Niro) could be classified as a star: he is now a mega-star and Christopher Walken and Meryl Streep aren't far behind. 'Lower middle-class' might be nearer the mark. The main characters are supposed to be 'working class' - to Americans, this might be how they come across: to a European, they look far too well off to belong in that class bracket. Imo, it's a fairly terrible film and a failure on just about every level.Д¬ertain flaws that were not apparent at the time are all too clear now: the dreadful 'underlining' of its message, the laborious 'set up' of the 'first act' before the men land in Viet Nam, the sledgehammer irony (if that's what it is - I'm not sure even Cimino knew) of the survivors' mournful chorus of God Bless America.ДЄnd the hopelessly protracted (and unnecessary) Russian wedding the first act. I saw it again last week and found it unbelievably mannered, unforgivably prolix and generally fixated on its own portentousness. I first saw it in 1984 and was impressed - although I can recall, even at that young age, that it was possibly over-long. It's hard to remember that it was universally acclaimed as a 'masterpiece' back in 1978.